Forum Topic: Mac Version of Marvelous Designer <---- When is it coming!!! - You guys are killing ME!

  Reply
First 1 2 3 4 5  >> Last 
#41. 30 Apr 2012 00:36
angel Wrote:
rboucier did you just take vintorix´s baited hook - restrain yourself ! The facts speak for them-self America´s most healthy company is .... ´A´ 

Sorry. I´m bored, waiting for this beta release. Thought I was on Gizmodo for awhile there. ;^)


Anyway...


Seriously, how cool would MD be with a full blown iOS touch interface? This program is already unbelievable. The soft body physics simulator they sell for 200USD? Crazy.


The first good touch implementation of MD will probably be for Windows 8 (maybe simultaneous Mac release?). Whatever it´s on, I´ll buy it.


#42. 30 Apr 2012 04:11
vintorix Wrote:

I worked for years with Macintosh -programming custom system. In those days the Mac was used almost exclusively by Graphic designers for printing so I was kind of an odd bird. I wasn´t before I met an professional graphic designer who didn´t use Mac, and when I heard all his well thought out reasons and background I understood that the Mac isn´t a good system even for the graphic work. Twice the price half the performance.

 

To begin with people doesn´t really understand the difference. PC is an open system, Mac is a closed. That means that Microsoft has to make 10 000 drivers where Apple can make one. That also means that with PC you are a free man. With Mac you are a subject. The late Steve Jobs was a control freak who rather have his teeth drawnout than release some software documentation. BTW when you make a new computer the software is more important than the hardware and when the Macintosh was build Microsoft had more people on it than Apple. Without Word and Excel and the rest of the Office suit the Mac never would have lifted. So Microsoft did the bear part of it.

 

To use Mac means that you are left behind. Everything comes late in the Mac world, if at all.  3ds max doesn´t run on Mac and now Marvelous Designer for Mac is two years late. Macintosh is not for professionals it is for girls and people who think they can have everything easy. Real men (and women) use PC. For more controll.

Wow. I cannot even count the ways that post made you sound like an asshat. Since I´ve seen you around various boards for years, I´m pretty sure that´s not how you intended it to sound. Next time please take breath and re-read before you hit submit. I´d really appreciate it.


A few things. Windows started as a hybridized, slapped on interface that was designed by Bill Gates to make a PC work like a Mac. Gates started out programming for a mac environment but didn´t want to have to program to the tighter Mac standards, so he switched to PCs and proceeded to release incredibly buggy software which people have been suffering with for decades now. And I do mean suffering. Think about Vista for a few minutes before you respond. THAT was suffering. And the Office suite hit its´ peak 2 versions ago. Each version since then has been less integrated and with worse design and implementation of even the good things they implemented. The MAC versions, on the other hand, have had better implementation and better interfaces. They even integrate a bit better (still not as well as the Office 2k version but better then their Office 2003 and 2007 counterparts). On the other hand, iWorks exports to the Office suites and is highly integrated... A version or two more, and they should be on par with everything MS Office has to offer.


In the meantime, Mac has worked to enable Mac users to not only be able to continue to use Mac software but to also interface with PCs and run their software. Like getting the Pentium chips and being able to install 2 operating systems simultaneously, so we can switch back and forth. 


Being a real woman, a graphic artist (both 2D and 3D), and a designer, I use a Mac both personally and professionally. So does most of my entire company´s production department. Sometimes it is a PitA, but for the most part we are more productive and happier about it than when we were all on PCs. Even if it gives our IT department fits. =D


#43. 30 Apr 2012 04:47
: )

Modeling & Illustrative Consulting

Retired COO Nemetschek N.A. Architectural CAD Dev.

Dir. VIdeo & Television Production, Ernest & Young

Captain, Military Intelligence



#44. 30 Apr 2012 05:28
I am sorry if you didn´t like what I said ldyjewell. But I wouldn´t have said it if I didn´t mean it.. I am (or was) a professional user of both Macintosh and PC for many years as a programmer and user and supporter of both. It is my opinion as a professional that the Mac is inferior. That is one persons opinion. No more no less.


#45. 30 Apr 2012 07:32
I just wouldn´t want to be in a hospital needing medical attention and cuss the format - don´t all doctors and emergency services use Mac to save lives... they might get emotional & forget to fix you ... such is the divide.


#46. 30 Apr 2012 09:09

Yes Macintosh is popular with doctors. I was often in hospitals for consult work when I was active. It is also popular in the advertisement business, with teachers with executives and so on, people who have other things to do.  The Mac was designed to be easy for the complete beginner and occasional users. But people who sit before the computer 8-10 hours a day has other needs.

 

Minorities has to be vocal to be noticed but just because you are a vociferous underdog doesn´t mean that you are right.


#47. 30 Apr 2012 11:47

and mac have viruses now too :)

they are not better anymore as pc´s


#48. 30 Apr 2012 11:57
The most worst wars are fought because of religions. 
Please stop this discussion and let everyone be happy with their favorite platform.



#49. 30 Apr 2012 12:17

Apple is seeing more focus on their systems for infection then ever before probably due to the constant attention of Apple´s growth and everyone else trying to catch up. Every system out there is prone to attach.. just look at DOD, FBI incursions. Apple´s closed system, which some have lambasted has always been a protective barrier in itself, while the open system of windows has always made it an easy target.


After 30 yrs of buggy infected window systems and applications to say that OSX is a lesser animal because they are now under attach is my friend a far stretch. Freedom seems to be a hot topic today in almost every conversation... I want to do whatever I want attitude...well in most cases, structure is a good thing.


MD2/3 whatever you want to call it including Mac does not mean that its going to have 2 years worth of bugs compared to the Windows version. We do not move back to day one of the first Windows version folks.


The current trend in software development in professional programs is to put users into maintenance programs which effectively leaves us with a constant stream of beta´s.


Take a look at how many programs you have that are not in a beta stage on your platform already... even the freebies for hobbyists.


Not a sermon....just an observation.

Modeling & Illustrative Consulting

Retired COO Nemetschek N.A. Architectural CAD Dev.

Dir. VIdeo & Television Production, Ernest & Young

Captain, Military Intelligence



#50. 30 Apr 2012 14:33

It would be so cool to create a product like the software industry and call it ´beta´ and get paid for it. I can´t imagine doing another plane or range of nuro-surgical tools and expect clients to stump up payment for a year or two - while we iron out the bugs. 




  Reply
First 1 2 3 4 5  >> Last